We all know that you ca n’t run Flash on Apple ’s nomadic gimmick . But now Apple is trying to make it impossible to develop for iPhones in any other development environs but Apple ’s own . Oh boy .
There ’s one principal mark this interferes with : Adobe , whose upcomingPackager for iPhonein CS5 lets you develop applications in Flash ( or specifically , ActionScript 3 , Flash ’s aboriginal scripting language ) and then cross - compile them so that they work in both a web internet browser ’s Flash plugin and as a standalone iPhone lotion .
The thinking goes like this : While applications written this way might not have the performance of applications written in Objective - C , the iPhone ’s native development linguistic communication , they ’d be good enough — and they ’d tolerate developers who already cognise ActionScript to avoid deliver to learn a Modern language . ( At least in theory . The plot above , “ THAT ROACH GAME “ , was made with Flash . One commentator noted “ The life and fade must be work out with a hand calculator . The developer should consider some night classes . ” )
In iPhone OS4 ’s licensing agreement , however , it appears that Apple is specificallyproscribing languages for iPhone app macrocosm .
How would Apple ever acknowledge what words was originally used if the closing result is Objective - hundred ( or C or C++ ) ? From speaking to a Flash developer who may vacate an iPad covering he has already been puzzle out on in ActionScript , most of the interbreeding - compilers * apply a band of co-ordinated libraries that are easy to recognize , even after the being hoard into iPhone apps .
In light , Apple is forcing a huge turn of developer to change their development environment of choice simply to promote them to move aside from a competition ’s platform . It is unclear if appsalready on the App Storethat have been educate using these tools will be banned .
Hello , FTC ? Apple just return Go . * * [ ★ ]
This change arrangement affects more than just Flash developer , although it is my view that it is only Adobe with which Apple is have-to doe with strategically .
- Okay , this is n’t an antimonopoly consequence , per se . But it ’s certainly unjust .
Update 2 : Gruber has stake a related to consideration , “ Why Apple Changed Section 3.3.1 “ .
Daily Newsletter
Get the best tech , scientific discipline , and culture news show in your inbox daily .
News from the future , deport to your nowadays .
You May Also Like
